Quote:Let's settle this once and for all.
No words. No BS, from either side.
All I want are variations here: if you think you can show a clear -/+ or better, please do so with variations. No talking. Just variations.
You guys talk too much. If you want us to shut our mouths about the gambit, please show us why.
NeX iRae
1 d4 d5 2 e4 dxe4 3 Nc3 ...
-/+ is asking a lot from Black. I don't think that White is lost by playing the BDG, simply that he no longer can be said to have the advantage. Viewing chess as a game solved to a draw with best play, this is immaterial, and in that sense, I do not think the BDG will ever be refuted.
But I am willing to take up the position from the other thread, if only so that I learn something. Perhaps it will teach me to be more ambitious against the BDG. At least, understand that I am playing for =+, and would not be disappointed with static equality, so if seeing such a continuation is insufficient to convince you, then you need not reply. Others may prefer more enterprising play with Black. For me, play continues:
1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bg4 6.h3 Bxf3 7.Qxf3 c6 (you may consider this a conditional move if you prefer an alternative for White).